ABSTRACT
Many patients hospitalized due to COVID-19 presented with varying degrees of impairments and disabilities mostly attributed to prolonged ICU stay. The consequences of severe respiratory illness and longer duration of ICU stay can lead to long-term physical, emotional, and cognitive dysfunction. The rehabilitation department at SBH Health System had its own set of challenges and had to quickly adapt to constant changes and needs of the patients. This chapter focuses on the important role of rehabilitation in pandemic response, restoring function, and recovery of COVID-19 survivors. It outlines the effectiveness of prone positioning and early mobilization that can make a significant difference in the patients' long-term quality of life. The integrated approach to discharge planning with multidisciplinary involvement facilitated a smooth transition from the hospital to their home. This helped as demands for post-acute care needs increased whether it was skilled nursing facilities for short-term rehabilitation, home care services, or outpatient services, including virtual rehabilitation or telehealth. © SBH Health System 2022.
ABSTRACT
Background: Targeted Immune-Modulating Therapies (TIMT) and immunomodulators (IMM) for Immune Mediated Inflammatory diseases (IMID) theoretically interfere with humoral responses against COVID19. However, IMID patients and particularly patients receiving immunosuppressive treatment were excluded from phase-3 COVID19 vaccination efficacy trials. Real-world observational data is therefore required to provide more insight into the efficacy of COVID19 vaccination in IMID patients. Method(s): The BELCOMID study is a multidisciplinary, prospective observational cohort study performed at two university hospitals and set up with the intention to explore the interaction between IMIDs, immune-modulating treatment modalities and SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination in a real-life patient cohort. Consecutive patients seen between 17/12/2020 and 28/02/2021 during routine follow-up for IMIDs of the gut, joints and skin were invited to participate. Both patient data and serological samples were collected at 3 predefined periods (Figure 1: Before vaccination, after start of the national vaccination campaign before booster vaccination, after booster vaccination). Spike (S) protein antibodies were analysed with the Abbott ArchitectTM assay. R version 4.0.2 was used to perform analyses. Result(s): At inclusion period 2, 2065 patients (Table 1) participated of whom 1547 had received complete baseline vaccination (2 doses mRNA-1273, BNT162b2, ChadOx1 nCoV-19 or 1 dose JN78436735). S-antibody seroconversion rate was 91.2%. At inclusion period 3, data was available for 1566 patients of whom 74.7% had received 1 booster (BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273) vaccination leading to a S-antibody seroconversion rate of 98.3%. In 130 patients who had received 2 boosters, S-antibody seroconversion rate was 100%. At period 3, 37 patients had refused all vaccinations. Although 23 of these had experienced confirmed COVID19 since previous inquiry, no S-antibody seroconversion was found in 15 of them. Logistic regression analyses revealed that the odds of no S-antibody seroconversion were significantly higher in IMID patients treated with IMM, combination of IMM+TIMT, systemic steroids and smoking patients at both inclusion periods (Table 2). TIMT monotherapy did not influence seroconversion rates at inclusion period 3 but was associated with higher odds of the lowest S-antibody titre quartile (OR2.32, P<0.001). Among TIMT options, rituximab had higher odds of S-seronegativity. Conclusion(s): S-antibody seroconversion rate in this real-life IMID population was high after baseline vaccination and increased further proportionally with booster vaccination, highlighting the value of repeated vaccination. However, the serologic response may be blunted due to different IMID treatment modalities and smoking.
ABSTRACT
Background: Patients with immune-mediated infammatory diseases (IMID) are at higher risk for infectious diseases. Despite this increased risk and the available guidelines1,2, we reported a suboptimal vaccination rate of 27 % of IMID patients in 2018. In the meantime, a vaccination module was introduced in the electronic patient medical record (EMR) of our hospital to accurately document and monitor vaccination status of patients. Objectives: To evaluate the impact of a new vaccination module in the patient health record on vaccination coverage in a previously included IMID cohort. Methods: Between Aug and Oct 2021, the vaccination status of 1435 (out of the original 1488) IMID patients (45 % male, median age 53.6 years) was collected (790 patients with IBD (infammatory bowel diseases), 607 with rheumatologic infammatory conditions (RHEU)(RA or SpA), and 38 with dermatologic infam-matory conditions(DER)) and was compared to that of 2018. The vaccination status for infuenza (FLU), pneumococci (Pnc), hepatitis B (Hep B) and tetanus (TT) was obtained mainly through the patients' electronic medical records. Missing data were added after contacting patients or their general practitioner. Results: From 2018 to 2021, the overall vaccination coverage (excluding TT) of all IMID patients signifcantly increased from 42 % to 66 % (p<0.001, Figure 1). For patients with RHEU, the vaccination coverage signifcantly increased, namely from 69.0% to 75 % for FLU (p<0.001), from 36 % to 89 % for Pnc (p<0.001), from 57 % to 73 % for Hep B (p<0.001) and from 34 % to 74 % overall (p=0.008) (Figure 1 and Table 1). Similarly, the vaccination coverage in IBD patients increased signifcantly from 76 % to 87 % for FLU (p<0.001), from 73 % to 82 % for Pnc (p<0.001), from 67 % to 79 % for Hep B (p<0.001) and from 47 % to 61 % overall (p<0.001) (Figure 1 and Table 1). For patients with DER, vaccination coverage signifcantly increased from 47 % to 65 % for Hep B (p<0.001) (Table 1). TT vaccination coverage decreased in all 3 IMID groups from 2018 to 2021. Conclusion: The implementation of a vaccination tool integrated in the EMR coincided with a signifcant increase in vaccination rates and also in the total amount of IMID patients that were fully vaccinated according to guidelines. Quite likely, the suboptimal vaccination rate measured in 2018 and the COVID-19 pandemic also raised awareness among patients and healthcare professionals about the importance of following vaccination guidelines.
ABSTRACT
Background Patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMID) are at higher risk for infectious diseases. Despite this increased risk and the available guidelines1, we reported a suboptimal vaccination rate of 33.8% of IMID patients in 2018. In the meantime, a vaccination module was introduced in the electronic patient health record of our hospital to accurately document and monitor vaccination status of patients. The impact of this new module on vaccination coverage was re-evaluated in the same IMID patients in 2021. Methods Between Aug and Oct 2021, the vaccination status of 1448 (out of the original 1488) IMID patients (44.8% male, median age 53.6 years) was collected (798 patients with IBD, 612 with rheumatological, and 38 with dermatological inflammatory conditions) and compared to that of 2018. The vaccination status was obtained mainly through the patients' electronic medical records. Missing data were added after contacting patients or their general practitioner. Results From 2018 to 2021, the overall vaccination coverage of all IMID patients significantly increased from 33.8% to 51.1% (p<0.001, Figure 1). The vaccination coverage in IBD patients increased significantly from 75.9% to 86.3% for influenza (p<0.001), from 72.9% to 88.7% for pneumococci (p<0.001), from 66.0% to 80.2% for hepatitis B (p<0.001), from 79.9% to 85.7% for tetanus (p=0.041) and from 42.2% to 60.4% overall (p<0.001) (Figure 1 and Table 1). Similarly, the vaccination coverage significantly increased for rheumatology patients, namely from 69.3% to 78.3% for influenza (p<0.001), from 34.5% to 85.0% for pneumococci (p<0.001) and from 32.8% to 36.5% for hepatitis B (p<0.001) (Table 1). For patients with dermatological inflammatory conditions, vaccination coverage significantly increased from 60.5% to 81.6% for pneumococci (p=0.031) and from 47.1% to 55.3% for hepatitis B (p=0.002) (Table 1). Conclusion The suboptimal vaccination rate measured in 2018 and the COVID-19 pandemic stressed the importance of vaccination recommendations to patients and healthcare professionals. We here show that the implementation of a vaccination tool integrated in the electronic medical record of patients is correlated with a significant increase in specific vaccination rates and also in the total amount of IMID patients that were fully vaccinated according to guidelines. 1. Rahier JF, Magro F, Abreu C, et al. Second European evidence-based consensus on the prevention, diagnosis and management of opportunistic infections in inflammatory bowel disease. J Crohns Colitis. 2014;8:443–468.(Figure Presented)(Table Presented)
ABSTRACT
It was suggested that all SARS-CoV2 infections lead to development of specific IgG antibodies that remain detectable in time. Targeted Immune-Modulating Therapies (TIMT) for treatment of Immune Mediated Inflammatory diseases (IMID) could interfere with humoral immune response against COVID-19. To investigate the seroprevalence of SARS-CoV2 IgG in relation to previous exposure to COVID-19 and ongoing IMID treatment a cross-disciplinary, prospective observational cohort was set up at two Belgian university hospitals. Between 17/12/2020 and 28/02/2021, patients with IMIDs of the skin (psoriasis (PsO), hidradenitis suppurativa (HS), atopic dermatitis (AD)), gut or joints were asked to participate. Patients under conventional systemic treatment or TIMT were included. An electronic survey (REDCap®) and blood samples were obtained (SARS-CoV-2IgG Abbott–Architect kit®). Statistical analyses were performed with SPSS26. 2166 IMID patients consented to take part. 1913 completed the survey: 218 dermatology patients (77% PsO, 12% HS, 11% AD), 415 rheumatology and 1217 IBD patients. 372 patients (19.5%) reported having experienced symptoms suggestive of COVID-19: fatigue (61.3%) and headache (48.1%) were most frequent. 96 patients (5.04%) had a positive SARS-CoV2 PCR test on nasal or throat swab: in 45.8% anti-SARS-CoV2 IgG seroconversion was confirmed. There was no significant difference in seroconversion rate between the 2 treatment groups (P=0.192). Of the seroconverted group, 75.0% were treated with TIMT. Prevalence of COVID-19 symptoms and number of confirmed COVID-19 cases remain low in this IMID cohort, regardless of treatment modality. There was no significant difference in SARS- CoV2 IgG seroconversion rate between TIMT and conventional systemic treatment in patients with positive PCR.
ABSTRACT
Background: Immunomodulators (IMM) and Targeted Immune-Modulating Therapies (TIMT) such as anti-TNF, anti-interleukins and Janus Kinase inhibitors, for treatment of Immune Mediated Inflammatory diseases (IMID) could theoretically interfere with the cytokine storm and humoral immune response against COVID19 infection and vaccination. We investigate seroprevalence and evolution of SARS-CoV2 antibodies in relation to previous vaccination and/or exposure to COVID19 and ongoing IMID-treatment in a Belgian, reallife population of IMID patients. Methods: A cross-disciplinary, prospective, observational cohort study was set up at two university hospitals. All patients with IMIDs of the gut (Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis), joints (rheumatoid, psoriatic or spondyloarthritis) and skin (psoriasis, hidradenitis suppurativa, atopic dermatitis) visiting the respective clinics were asked to participate. Patients had to fill out an electronic survey (REDCap®, based on WHO-ISARIC) and blood samples were drawn for serology testing (anti-Spike(S) and antiviral Nucleocapsid(N) protein antibody IgG, Abbott). Results at baseline, prior to the national vaccination program and at 6 months follow-up are presented. R version 4.0.2 was used for statistical analyses. Results: At baseline 2165 IMID patients consented to take part. In 3.2% SARS-CoV2 anti-N seroconversion was confirmed. Of the anti-N seroconverted patients 72.9% reported a positive PCR test prior to inclusion. At 6-months follow-up, data of 1853 IMID patients was collected. Of these, 81.7% were fully and 14.4% partially vaccinated. Seroconversion for anti-N antibodies was confirmed in 2.5% of all participants and seroconversion for anti-S antibodies in 90.8%. In 5.1% (61/1483) of fully vaccinated IMID patients no seroconversion in anti-N nor anti-S antibodies was found. Chi Square analyses show, at 6-months follow-up, no significant association between anti-S seroconversion rate and treatment with systemic steroids (RiskRatio 1.22, 95%CI 0.38-3.9, P=0.99), TIMT (RiskRatio 0.57, 95% CI 0.3-1.1, P=0.12), IMM (RiskRatio 1.65, 95% CI 0.85- 3.19, P=0.19) or combination treatment IMM/TIMT (RiskRatio 1.60, 95% CI 0.75-3.4, P=0.32). Appearance of COVID19 symptoms followed the epidemiological curve in Belgium (Fig1). Conclusion: In this real-life IMID cohort, the number of COVID19 cases confirmed by PCR prior to vaccination was low. Seroconversion rate for anti-N antibodies was lower at 6-months follow-up, suggesting decrease in antibody titre over time. Full COVID19 vaccination led to a high anti-S antibody seroconversion rate. Nonetheless, 5.1% of fully vaccinated patients showed no antibody seroconversion. So far, no significant association between anti-S antibody seroconversion and IMID treatment was noted.
ABSTRACT
Background: Patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMID) are at higher risk for infectious diseases. Despite this increased risk and the available guidelines1, we reported a sub-optimal vaccination rate of 27.4% of IMID patients in 2018. In the meantime, a vaccination module was introduced in the electronic patient health record of our hospital to accurately document and monitor vaccination status of patients. The impact of this new module on vaccination coverage was re-evaluated in the same IMID patients in 2021. Methods: Between Aug and Oct 2021, the vaccination status of 1448 (out of the original 1488) IMID patients (44.8% male, median age 53.6 years) was collected (798 patients with IBD, 612 with rheumatological, and 38 with dermatological inflammatory conditions) and compared to that of 2018. The vaccination status was obtained mainly through the patients' electronic medical records. Missing data were added after contacting patients or their general practitioner. Results: From 2018 to 2021, the overall vaccination coverage of all IMID patients significantly increased from 27.4% to 51.9% (p<0.001, Figure 1). The vaccination coverage in IBD patients increased significantly from 75.9% to 86.3% for influenza (p<0.001), from 72.9% to 88.7% for pneumococci (p<0.001), from 66.0% to 80.2% for hepatitis B (p<0.001), from 79.9% to 85.7% for tetanus (p=0.041) and from 42.2% to 60.4% overall (p<0.001) (Figure 1 and Table 1). Similarly, the vaccination coverage significantly increased for rheumatology patients, namely from 69.3% to 78.3% for influenza (p<0.001), from 34.5% to 85.0% for pneumococci (p<0.001), from 32.8% to 36.5% for hepatitis B (p<0.001) and from 7.8% to 32.6% overall (p<0.001) (Figure 1 and Table 1). Conclusion: The suboptimal vaccination rate measured in 2018 and the COVID-19 pandemic stressed the importance of vaccination recommendations to patients and healthcare professionals. We here show that the implementation of a vaccination tool integrated in the electronic medical record of patients is correlated with a significant increase in specific vaccination rates and also in the total amount of IMID patients that were fully vaccinated according to guidelines.
ABSTRACT
Background: With the continuous spreading of SARS-CoV-2 globally, the probability for interactions between humans who are infected and wildlife tends to grow intensely, as well as the likelihood of viral spillover from humans to biodiversity. This aspect is of great concern for wildlife conservation and human health, because the list of highly susceptible animal groups that have contracted SARS-CoV-2 (bats, mustelids, and primates) is large and, once infected, these groups can act as vectors and reservoirs, becoming a substrate for viral mutations and recombinations and boosting the risk of new strains emerging, which can return to humans as new diseases. Little is known about the inducing factors facilitating coronavirus spillover from one species to another, but it can be argued that interface zones between wild fauna and humans, which are narrow edges between anthropic (cities, roads, parks, ecotourism sites, and agricultural frontiers) and sylvatic habitat, are zones of increased interaction between humans and wild animals, and thus have a higher probability of viral spillover events than other areas. In a similar context, the habitat compression by forest fragmentation also brings species and infected beings closer, reducing their home ranges and intensifying the risk of spillover among wild populations. Therefore, on the basis of the premise for zoonosis—the greater human–animal interaction, the greater risk of viral spillover—we aimed to identify the most and least susceptible areas to viral spillover in Brazil. Methods: We developed an approach combining ecological modelling (Biomod2: modelling habitat suitability for 158 bat and 49 primate species) and geographical information systems (by using demographic indicators, roads, and related variables) to map the most and least susceptible areas to spillover in Brazil. This map indicates priority areas for serological surveillance of fauna for monitoring the spillover and circulation of SARS-CoV-2 strains and variants in Brazilian biodiversity. Findings: Among our most relevant preliminary results, we found that forested areas surrounding the São Paulo Metropolitan Area are among the most susceptible areas for spillover. This resulted from the combination of high contaminated human density and high density of non-human primates interacting with humans in these transitional areas. Interpretation: Because of the high resolution of the results, the map can be useful for action planning and decision making in conservation and health, since susceptible areas denote not only a greater risk of virus jumping from humans to animals, but also of coronaviruses returning from fauna to humans in new viral strains. Funding: Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP;2019/12988-7 and 2018/14389-0).